With his lies exposed by this thread and the fact that he is monitoring it, ....
It appears Plaintiff deleted several more recent threads, including the one where he claims to know more than the experts about Native Americans and his whole thread about how he gave the DCNR an "offer they can't refuse" and the DCNR's denial to allow him to dig on PA DCNR land.
Dowsing is a mind trick, it doesn't work any better than intuition and guessing allow. In the past I've offered to demonstrate to you that this is true, and that offer still stands. Of all the methods used to find treasure, dowsing (and LRLs) has produced the absolutely worst results. In fact, more treasures have been found by pure accident than with dowsing. No one is going to take you seriously if they know you are using dowsing as even a part of your methods. Couple to that the fact that you have absolutely nothing to show anyone from this endeavor, or any other endeavor, in the way of a hold-in-your-hand recovery, and it's no wonder DCNR is giving this a pass. Like I said before, show them some real finds if you want to get their attention. And, please, not turtle rocks.
It happened right after I posted this reply:
I walked that site with prada years ago, no evidence of it being native at all. Geological formation similar to the rest of the sand stone in pa. Only evidence of man was the stone cutting from it used in 1800s to build a chimney just down the hill from this site.Plaintiffs latest post, 6/23/24. You know what "amazes me", is how Plaintiff admitted after finding this site he knows little about Indigenous people and needs an expert, but when said expert tells him something that doesn't confirm his beliefs and preferred narrative, he attacks them!
View attachment 597832
......., no evidence of it being native at all. .......
....... a concerted effort by Plaintiff to time again misrepresent evidence, fabricate evidence, lie about the evidence .........
..........just an attention seeking liar,...
And I know we have gone over this before, but I think Plaintiff is sincere. Because when someone *starts* with a philosophical presupposition, then all-of-reality (the evidence, etc....) is shaped and filtered through the lens of their philosophical presupposition. Just as my DMDB video shows. So too do I think Plaintiff can sincerely think there is or was a fabulous treasure there (and all the others elsewhere he keeps yapping about).
Just at the patient in my video was, uh... ."quite sincere" :
I have mentioned it before in this thread. I met him once at this site not long after he first mentioned this supposed native site on another forum. He showed me round stacked field stone claiming they were native American graves. He then took me to the sand stone outcrop. He thinks it was a "vortex" and worshiped by the natives. He also thinks the stones were stacked in structures because there are a bunch of large rectangular rocks. Most of them are very uneven blocks that look like it happened in natural fractures. Some were left over from 1800s farms nearby, and a couple hundred yards down the hill there is a old chimney made from the same stone (which he claims is the site of a kgb stash in an underground cave but thats another story). One of the truck size sandstone boulders is vaguely shaped like an arrow head which he also states as evidence. A huge natural crack in the sandstone was a "carved hallway". And it keeps going and going. He lets his imagination run wild in a machinegun fire type of way. It literally kept jumping from one thing to another with no correlation or use of reason. Geology and the history of the area was ignored. With some simple google searching i was able to find out everything from how the glaciers carved that area and the stones it dropped off, to the accounts of the first settlers of that specific piece of land and how they cursed the leader for settling in an area with all those stones. It made their life tough and made it very hard to farm( those stacked field stones were graves though!). The origional settlers even said it was as if a god spilled an apron full of rocks across the land. But evidence like this they didn't even look for or consider. It just had to be some fantastic story to rewrite history in their minds. I tried to kinda insert some opinions of mine to explain things but it was ignored. An example of this was pointing out that "carved hallway" had matching sides almost as if you could stick it back together from where it broke and moved down the hill, minus some weathering of course. But they just jumped on to the next thing. It was honestly tiring trying to listen to it all. There was much more that went on but very little had much worth looking into. From what i could figure in the end that site came down to glaciers and 1800s stone cutting and stacking for the settlers in the nearby area.Tpmetal:
Since you spent time with parada can you share your observations of his psychosis?
I feel he is like so many con men and hucksters just trying to cash in on others gullibility! Buyer Beware!!
parada knows he is lying about everything and DOESN’T beleive he ever found gold.
Dents run is no different than his Templar graves and vaults he said he found in Nova Scotia. Once he realized no one bought into his con he moved on and never looked back.
All of what you say is indicative of delusional thinking. I've been around a number of guys who think the same way, and they honestly believe everything they say, at least consciously. When the facts cannot be ignored or dismissed any longer, the story changes to something else, like KGB or Native Americans. If you want a long-running example of this, go to TNet and visit the Treasure Marks/Signs forum, particularly the thread "A Guide to Vault Treasure Hunting." You'll read the exact same stuff, been going strong for 8 years now.And it keeps going and going. He lets his imagination run wild in a machinegun fire type of way. It literally kept jumping from one thing to another with no correlation or use of reason.