Minelab Manticore Headphone Upgrade

ThatGuyAgain

Forum Supporter
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Messages
87
Location
Swampscott, MA
Disclaimer: If you choose to follow in my possibly misguided footsteps, please be aware that you might destroy your headphones and not be able to get replacements for some time.

I got a Manticore in the mail about a month ago and love it with only a few small caveats. The biggest annoyance for me is that the headphones are absolutely horrible. The ear cups are nice and large, but they don’t have a pivoting head, so they don’t conform to your head at all - even less than prior Minelab headphones. As a result, they feel a bit like someone took old 80s/90s Walkman headphones and make them over-the-ear instead of on-ear. Then there’s the waterproofing issue. It isn’t that these aren’t waterproof. It’s that they aren’t environment proof. There are reports of these headphones failing from high humidity alone - given I live by the ocean and do most of my detecting during or just after bad weather on beaches, this is a pretty huge limitation.

So what is good about these headphones?
  • They have a low-latency wireless connection to the detector
  • They charge via USB-C
What is bad about these headphones?
  • Uncomfortable - They don’t seal around my ears and just generally feel cheap
  • BULKY - They don’t hinge or fold anywhere for packing
  • Flimsy - the exposed wires are just begging for them to break
  • Weatherproofing - If a humid day can take these out, then they aren’t likely to stand up to stormy weather on a beach.
What is useless?
  • The optional wired connection. I want a wired headphone when I’m planning to submerge the control box. Why would I want that when the headphones themselves aren’t waterproof? In fairness, I have seen this kind of logic in the past with Minelab. When I got my 800, the WM-08 unit that came with it included a waterproof headphone connector, but was not waterproof itself and would not work with waterproof headphones (this led to a very long and confused call with Minelab)
So here’s my plan:

I have an old pair of Sony WM1000-MX4 headphones that broke but I kept swearing I would fix them. If I remove the guts from these, I might be able to fit the Manticore components inside the Sony body, giving me a much more compact, robust, and comfortable headphone with better weatherproofing. It still wouldn’t be perfect, but it would be a big step up.

I did a teardown of the Manticore headphones yesterday and they are remarkably simple. There are two boards, the battery, and the speakers. The main board is exactly the size of the 1000mAh battery that was in the Sony’s previously, so it already has a new home. The secondary board has 3 tactile buttons and the USB-C port as well as the voltage regulator / charge module. The battery is a simple 500mAh li-ion battery. The boards are both well labeled, so it’s a fairly straightforward teardown. I’m planning to put together some wiring and board schematics for anyone else who wants to try this.

Where I stand today: I have verified that all the parts will fit inside the Sony body with some minor modifications. I need to grind down the secondary board slightly, cut new button holes in the Sony body, and remove part of the inner structure on the Sony. I’ll then need to run new wiring through the headband and de/re-solder everything. I have decided not to expose the auxiliary headphone port since these will still not be waterproof and I’d rather just use my Grey Ghost headphones if I’m going in the wet. I’m waiting for some heatshrink to come in the mail before I go all in on this operation, but hopefully I’ll have an update here in a week or two.

What am I risking?
Well the obvious answer here is my Manticore headphones themselves. I have 17 years experience prototyping and doing both hardware and software development, but that doesn’t mean all my experiments work. I have had my fair share of “damn…I really hoped that would work” moments. There is also potential that I will succeed only to find out that I somehow impeded the low-latency signal with the new headphone body or that I really did want an aux-in plug. For now that’s a chance I’m willing to take.

What do I stand to gain?
  • Greater comfort
  • Improved weather sealing
  • Smaller pack size
  • No more exposed wiring —> Improved durability
  • Improved sound isolation for easier identification of faint targets
 
Quick update - I did it! And it’s glorious! It took a lot of modifications to the headphone body and to the boards to make it all fit together, but I got the guts of the Manticore headphones into a pair of Sony WH1000-MX4s. The fit and comfort are perfect and the audio is better than ever thanks to the extra insulation on the Sonys. I don’t need to have the volume cranked up quite so high to hear over the wind and waves.

I took them out to the beach this afternoon for their first real world test and they are SUCH AN IMPROVEMENT!

Here’s what I gained:
  • double the original battery capacity
  • improved noise isolation
  • improved speaker elements
  • improved comfort
  • improved durability (no exposed wires)
  • improved weather resistance
  • smaller pack size


    I’ll post some pictures of the end result along with a wiring diagram in the next few weeks.
 
I just finished my schematic for the Manticore headphones (attached). I'll start by stating that I did this mostly over a single day with only a little research done last week, so I could easily have missed something. I also am pretty burned out from trying to onboard 4 new engineering teams at my office, so my brain isn't firing on all cylinders right now - again, I may have missed something.

I don't know why, but for some reason, I thought the Manticore used a proprietary wireless communication mechanism and not Bluetooth (possibly because they never call out Bluetooth in the Manticore marketing and instead say, "low-latency wireless audio" or because they specify in the ML105 marketing that it has "higher quality audio than standard Bluetooth". Who knows?). However, the transceiver chip was a Bluetooth 5.2 transceiver available on Digikey and Mouser. I checked the FCC filing for the Minelab ML105 headphones, and sure enough, on page 6 of the FCC test results, it calls out:

Bluetooth Version V5.2
Modulation GFSK 1Mbps, GFSK 2Mbps
Number of Channels 40 Channels

Manticore Headphone Teardown and Wiring Diagram

On to the technique, tools, and materials:

Tools / materials:
  • J0 and J1 Phillips head screwdrivers (plus others for your replacement headphone shell)
  • small flathead screwdriver / pry bar
  • Soldering iron
  • desoldering pump
  • desoldering wick
  • heat gun
  • scraper / knife
  • flux
  • 1mm 2:1 heat shrink tubing
  • 30 AWG wire
  • acrylic conformal coating
  • Epoxy
  • Epoxy Putty, Thermoplastic, or something else moldable
  • Rotary tool with carving bits (dremel, Ryobi, etc.)



    Technique:

    Opening the ML105s is pretty easy. Unscrew the two exposed screws on the hinges to the right and left sides of each earcup. This allows the earcups to disconnect from the headband. Remove the foam from the earcups by pulling lightly to expose a small gap at the perimeter, then using a small prybar/screwdriver to gently slide around and disconnect the pressure clips. Once the foam is removed, you will see 4 small Phillips head screws that hold the earcups closed. Once these 4 screws are removed, carefully turn over each earcup and allow the speaker element to fall out. It will still be connected with a wire.

    Now comes the fun bit. I started by figuring out where the USB-C port was on my new headphone shell and ensuring that Board 1 would fit. It was close but not perfect. I was able to sand down the board a bit to make it fit without compromising any components / connections. Next, I determined where the buttons would be for each Vol -, Vol +, and Power. I did this using the original buttons from the ML105. I routed out holes for these and moved the buttons from the ML105s to their new home. I then used some epoxy putty to build supports for Board 1 so I could screw it down. I wanted to avoid ordering a new FFC cable, so I found a home for Board 2 that let me reuse the original cable. I turned everything on and checked where the LEDs would be most visible, then drilled a small hole in the earcup and filled it with clear epoxy to let the light shine out.

    I originally tried to retain as much of the original wiring as possible, but it was just too small for me to strip and re-solder with my hands, so I desoldered the 6 wires on Board 1 and replaced them with new 30 AWG wires that I ran to the battery and each speaker. To avoid FULLY disassembling the new headphones (some parts were glued / taped in place), so I used the newly-soldered 30 AWG wires as jumpers and soldering them to the original wires for the Sony headphones I was using, then used heat-shrink tubing to protect the connections.

    I just abandoned the 500 mAh battery from the ML105s. It was taped down VERY firmly and was also surrounded by a thin plastic border. I could either cut the border (and risk accidentally puncturing the battery), or try to leverage the battery out (and risk puncturing / bending the battery), so I opted to use the 1000 mAh battery from the Sony pair instead.

    Lastly, before I screwed the 2 boards into their new homes, I coated both with acrylic conformal coating. This just adds a bit more weatherproofing. After that, it was time to close it all up!


    Marketing Notes:

    The Bluetooth 5.2 thing really bothers me here. Minelab's marketing for the Manticore and the ML105 headphones both intentionally make it sound as though Minelab is using something better than Bluetooth while not actually saying that. They claim "higher quality audio than standard Bluetooth". But what is "standard Bluetooth"? If I define standard as Bluetooth 5 or as BLE, then yes, Bluetooth 5.2 is definitely better. It's also possible that they're doing something proprietary by limiting the frequencies these headphones use to avoid interference with the detector, and I just don't understand. But at their core, these are Bluetooth 5.2 headphones, which puts them in the same class as headphones like the OneOdio A11, the Razer Barracuda Pro, or the Sony WH1000 XM5. And that begs the question, why not just let us choose the headphones we want? If BT 5.2 is good enough, give us a cheap pair of BT 5.2 headphones with the detector (like they did) and declare clearly in the documentation that Bluetooth headphones are generally supported but that Minelab cannoy guarantee the performance of 3rd party headphones and strongly recommends BT 5.2 or above to avoid latency issues.
 
This is really good work. Thanks for posting it and documenting the swap so thoroughly. Regards
 
Great work, but very the obvious question is, has anybody tried to pair of V5.2 Bluetooth headphones to the Manticore?
Thanks - and I have, but with no luck yet. There must be some key required or something about the handshake process - maybe it’s looking only for specific hardware addresses to determine manufacturer. I even broke out my old Ubertooth, but it can’t intercept BT 5.2. I found a device that could intercept the 5.2 signal for debugging, but it would cost more than the detector and I don’t really care THAT much :-P
 
Thats a great shame...the headphones are the biggest complaint I have heard about the Manticore...I really don't understand why ML would offer a detector for twice the price of the Nox, and then bundle it with junk headphones...
 
Quick update - I did it! And it’s glorious! It took a lot of modifications to the headphone body and to the boards to make it all fit together, but I got the guts of the Manticore headphones into a pair of Sony WH1000-MX4s. The fit and comfort are perfect and the audio is better than ever thanks to the extra insulation on the Sonys. I don’t need to have the volume cranked up quite so high to hear over the wind and waves.

I took them out to the beach this afternoon for their first real world test and they are SUCH AN IMPROVEMENT!

Here’s what I gained:
  • double the original battery capacity
  • improved noise isolation
  • improved speaker elements
  • improved comfort
  • improved durability (no exposed wires)
  • improved weather resistance
  • smaller pack size


    I’ll post some pictures of the end result along with a wiring diagram in the next few weeks.
Sorry, but I may not have been very clear. I have the XP Deus bone phones. And I want to put the Minelab phone jack on the bone phone wire. Adapting the XP Deus phones to Minelab. I have the wiring Diagram. But can't make heads or tails out of it.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but I may not have been very clear. I have the XP Deus bone phones. And I want to put the Minelab phone jack on the bone phone wire. Adapting the XP Deus phones to Minelab. I have the wiring Diagram. But can't make heads or tails out of it.
I don't know about that one. There's more going on there than what I did in this case. Moving the wires over to the new board is trivial if the DII bone conduction headphones have the same wiring as the Manticore headphones and it's just the plug that is different. But they could have a different number of wires, use different digital signals, etc. and then you're just out of luck. Plus you'd almost certainly lose the underwater capabilities of the DII headphones since you'd have to open them up to make the change. With care, you'd be able to get some decent weatherproofing back, but most likely not full waterproofing.
 
Agree , volume sucks , and my old 800 EQ. headphones , I didn't get the noise from waves , ocean , and when people talked to me , I had to remove them to hear , with the Manticore headphones , I can accually hear the people talk along with everything else :mad: , a disappointment , upgrade no , an unexpected higher priced machine you--- expect better--- headphones , nope a rip off ! The company should replace them NO CHARGE !!!!!!!! DO TO poor quality with a higher priced machine !!!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom