• Forum Upgraded

    Most of the hard work is done as far as migrating members post/pics to the new forum.
    Please be patient as we work on other minor issues.
    Share your feedback here. Thanks, Vlad and Carol K
  • Forum emails have been fixed!

    If you were unable to login, request a new password and emails should go out now.
  • Gift Exchange Results

    The 2022 Gift Exchange results are in!

    A thread has been created here.

My first Large Cent!

marcus118

Forum Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
1,440
Location
Scotch Plains, NJ
Dug my first large cent yesterday! I can't see the date but I think its a Coronet so 1816-1839. I'd really love to clean this up to maybe see the actual date. Any tips? I've already done some toothpicking and tried some Vaseline with q-tips without much success. Thanks!

This photo is from before my initial cleaning:
07.02.2022-20.20.jpg
 

teotwawki12

Elite Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
1,079
Location
Michigan
Beauty! I imagine it is what it is (more cleaning will just remove detail, I suppose), but I'm going to leave it to Tom to tell you otherwise. Tom digs large cent every ten years and I am sure has learned the best processes!
 

Ron 71

Forum Supporter
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
5,293
Location
Middlesex co. Massachusetts
I could be wrong but I think I see 1816,
Not sure about a cleaning method, all the largies I’ve found have been very toasty.
Congrats on the find!
 

marcus118

Forum Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
1,440
Location
Scotch Plains, NJ
I could be wrong but I think I see 1816,
Not sure about a cleaning method, all the largies I’ve found have been very toasty.
Congrats on the find!

I do think the last number is 6. The third is either a 1 or 3 - so hard to see. i'm leaning toward 3 tho. so 1836 i think.
 

EmuDetector

Forum Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2019
Messages
1,928
Location
North VA
Congrats! Having dug more than a few of them I'll say toothpicks is about it. The fine details will vanish if you get aggressive. I'd stop now, coppers unfortunately just wear away.
 

teotwawki12

Elite Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
1,079
Location
Michigan
Dumb question since you have been on here since '08, but have you tried side lighting with a flashlight and a magnifying glass?
 

ToySoldier

Forum Supporter
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
2,939
Location
Kentucky
I do think the last number is 6. The third is either a 1 or 3 - so hard to see. i'm leaning toward 3 tho. so 1836 i think.

If we're assuming the last digit is a 6, and I think it is, then it isn't 1836. Make note the weak chin. That's the pre-1836 design. She received a face lift in 1836 prior to the braided hair redesign in 1839. That leaves either 1826 or 1816 and the gap between the second and third digits looks consistent with 1816.
 

chillforlife

Elite Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
983
Nice find. I was hoping you were going to say you found it in Idaho so I could feel I had a chance. Congrats though.

So you're saying there's a chance.
 

Digalicious

Elite Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
1,397
It's one of those finds that you'll never forget exactly where you found it :)

BTW- I sharpened the image, and it also looks like 1816 to me. Plus, what ToySoldier said.
 

marcus118

Forum Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
1,440
Location
Scotch Plains, NJ
Dumb question since you have been on here since '08, but have you tried side lighting with a flashlight and a magnifying glass?

Yep I've looked at just about every angle too lol. Sometimes I swear it looks like a 3, other times 1. The photo I posted definitely looks like a 1. It's funny because those numbers don't look anything alike.
 

marcus118

Forum Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
1,440
Location
Scotch Plains, NJ
If we're assuming the last digit is a 6, and I think it is, then it isn't 1836. Make note the weak chin. That's the pre-1836 design. She received a face lift in 1836 prior to the braided hair redesign in 1839. That leaves either 1826 or 1816 and the gap between the second and third digits looks consistent with 1816.

Ah thank you! That's a great point. I see the chin in 1837 onward is much more tucked. The 1816 chin looks much more like mine.
 

diggin4clad

Elite Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
5,706
Location
Eastern Connecticut
Judging from the picture, I'd say it's as good as it's going to get. Most of my large cents are toasted beyond hope so i just leave them alone.
 

Reelfoot Relics

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
346
Location
NW Tennessee
1816?

I see 1816 also but eyes can play tricks. Try taking pic with side lighting to create shadows and the change photo to black and white. You can adjust the contrast and brightness. Eliminating the color reduces distractions. Works for me sometimes. Couldn't see many details on this old token in original pic.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5374.jpg
    IMG_5374.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 412

marcus118

Forum Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
1,440
Location
Scotch Plains, NJ
Thanks again everyone. The more I look at this at different angles and under good light and with a loupe, I'm pretty certain it's an 1816. :cool3:
 
Top