Thanks Guys for doing the time and putting all together and sharing. Really interesting results. It's amazing that from one location to the next results can be so different. And really Amazed with the GT UT 13....WOW...
Thanks for putting the time in fellas. I appreciate all the work you guys put in and posting the results.
Keeps me sane from all this down time and the garbage white stuff that keeps dropping from the sky. My GOD will it ever stop ?
Got spoiled these last few Winters...this Winter is making up for lost time in a big way.
On the CZ set to "Sensitivity Max", was it cranked to the max regardless of sand mineralization, or the maximum without falsing?
Here is the link to my video. I just set it up on a tripod and let it run. You can kind of hear the talking about the machines, its not the greatest, also some foul language may be in it, so if that offends anyone sorry. It is 29 min long. On Cliff's vid he says what each machine is and coil size.
Clearwater Test
I am not sure what band you guys used but at 11" my teenie weenie sounded good on a narrow 14K band. I assume it was the same band Cliff brought to the test, narrow 14K about 3 grams or so. In PP mode mine was strong. In disc it sounded good but without overlapping my coil swings I might have missed it. Another hunter with us took his blue back to the car. His did not make a peep. Maybe there are differences in machines that are not inherent. Meaning some are hotter than others. I think a lot of variables exist but after seeing Dew's results I think a lot of people are now searching for a new GT coil. I already did, not many available.
Cliff any chance you can explain what the numbers mean? Us screen users got to understand the numbers
Glad you took your camera Joe, in my videos, I failed to turn on the camera for recording of the CTX and ATX.....got everyone but me!
I did in a few posts above but here is what I said...
Numbers listed on spreadsheet are in addition to the target depth (coil in air above sand)
So take for instance a number of 6 on the chart.... then add the target depth which would give you the total distance from the coil to the target.... target depth of 8" + 6" recorded (air space above target to coil) would equal 14" for that target.
IF I'd have thought all the detectors would have done as well as they did, I would have used either deeper targets or smaller ones to really push the machines.
On the CZ set to "Sensitivity Max", was it cranked to the max regardless of sand mineralization, or the maximum without falsing?
Wish I would have still had my GT with the SEF 10 x 12, my gut tells me it would held up to the 13" Ultimate.
I am not sure what band you guys used but at 11" my teenie weenie sounded good on a narrow 14K band. I assume it was the same band Cliff brought to the test, narrow 14K about 3 grams or so. In PP mode mine was strong. In disc it sounded good but without overlapping my coil swings I might have missed it. Another hunter with us took his blue back to the car. His did not make a peep. Maybe there are differences in machines that are not inherent. Meaning some are hotter than others. I think a lot of variables exist but after seeing Dew's results I think a lot of people are now searching for a new GT coil. I already did, not many available.