There is a difference between saying the best detector for the money and a good detectors for the money. I don't ever remember saying it was the best for the money. I do remember saying it was a good detector for the money and maybe the best I'd had for the money. How could I possible make the claim it is the best for the money when there are many I have never tried?
Starting my own thread does little to call you out on the BS that is meant to mislead those with less experience. Would you like me to quote how many times you suggested the Impact was as good or better than the Deus and F75?
You were fine just informing people what options the Impact has. When the trouble started was insinuating it was capable of keeping up with machines like the Deus and F75. And then when asked why you have all this plethora of information about how well it does when hunting, but no video, your pathetic answer is not knowing how to use a $25 camera or editing it. What's to edit. You take the video and if it real you put it on the site.
Talk all you want about what any detector has and I'll keep my posts to myself. Start insinuating BS and I'll be the first to call you out. Let's see those videos to backup those "nuisance target" claims. Talk is cheap. Surely one of the other testers has a video camera to back these claims up?
Your description posts were great and very informative. For that I thank you.
Put up and I'll shut up LOL.
See post 200,, here you say:
I found the Makro Racer 2 to be one of the most exceptional machines on the market FOR THE MONEY.
Yes in some instances depending on detecting scenario,,Impact can outperform Deus and F75 any series detector.
Gotta watch that small coil in action,,,stock coil on Impact outperforms F75 with stock coil any series on separation and unmasking and beats DST models for depth on both clad and silver US dimes.
There will be some targets heavily masked Deus will detect,,but user will not know the conductivity level of target,,,using smaller coil on Impact some of these same targets will yield a rather accurate ID for how difficult they are masked.
In bigger iron and some other highly crippled targets Impact will outperform Deus.
There were instances too,where Deus outperformed Impact on some targets(not depth related either).
I didn't realize a camera was a necessity for being a good tester and reporting information on performance.
Time will tell,,and folks will see.
Too bad will never here from you on the new Impact,,it's performance.
A footnote here.
All of my comments thus far when referring to Xp Deus in this thread,,refer to Deus version 3.2.
Remember version 4.0 Deus has been released since starting this thread and testing Impact.
If I add any more posts here,,,they will be in reference to Deus version 4.0.
Last edited: