All the war nickels I’ve found fell right in the nickel range,they didn’t ring up as a high conductor
I don't think any of us dig Nickel's to find Nickel's. Gold and Silver will sometimes ring up as Nickel range. I've hit 2 Gold that way.....
Also, I remember way-back-when, during the "silver rush" of the late 1970s and early 1980s, that a lot of guys cranked the disc. and angled for silver only. Ie.: why dig tabs and foil, when silver was easy-for-pickens in the then virgin parks ?
And sure enough, someone else would come along and chide them: "You might miss nickels". To which I recall one wise sage challenging the dissenter : "Take a look at the coin book. See what dates/mints of nickels are worth anything. Then take a look at the dime & quarter pages, and see which dates/mints are worth something " (especially us, who is near the SF mint).
And you would see that very few nickels are worth much numismatically. And, let's be honest: The ground "kisses" nickels with corrosion that leaves them numismatically worthless anyhow (ie.: even if it WAS a key date). Versus silver, which comes out shiny and un-damaged.
This has no bearing on relicky site strategy (demolition, cellar holes , stage stops, etc...). But when strictly coin hunting @ junky parks, it DOES have merit as a strategy.
Metal-addict & toasted : Couldn't the same thing be said of past machines, before the Nox ? Can't the same thing be said of a whole bunch of machines that aren't necessarily "more sensitive to lower conductors" ? After all, it's not hard to simply lower the disc. on any machine, and get "nickel" or "pulltab" signals. On a wide array of past machines.
So when something comes along and hits the market (like the Nox) touting "more sensitive to lower conductors", then ... I agree with IDX monster: If angling the parks for nickels is the objective, then "more sensitivity to lower conductors" is hardly a needed goal. The parks and fields are ALREADY loaded with low conductors, that generations of lazy md'rs have passed.
As said, this is a noble concern if someone is angling for earring studs, tinsel thin chains, nuggets, etc.... But when it comes to turf , then .... Simply lower the disc. knob. And you'd be guaranteed no lack of signals to choose from already.
this is why I dig shallow nickel signals.
Diggerjonny, Was that a relicky site ? Or a turfed park ? Assuming it was a turfed park (where age & depth tend to be correlated), I'll be the devil's advocate here (a job I'm good at, haha ) :
1) Take a close look at your shield nickel's numismatic condition. Ie.: How the ground treated the metal. What it would merit, if floated to a collector.
2) Now take a look at commensurately old silver coins you've found there in Indiana (1800s and early 1900s barbers, mercs, seateds, etc...).
3) Would you agree that the silver often comes out like the day it was lost (ie.: no "ground kiss") ? Versus nickels (such as that one) that are kissed 100% of the time ?
4) And let's be honest: While it's true that "sometimes an old coin can be shallow", yet ... in all your time of "digging shallow nickel signals", how often is a shield nickel (which are fun for sport's sake) found ? Wouldn't it be safe to say that 99.99% of the time it would be a new nickel ? And if it was a buffalo or V, it would be that burnt-orange/brown scenario ?
Almost every wedding band I have found. Has come up in that range, same as pull tabs. On the nox looks like that number is going to be 13.