detectingMO
Forum Supporter
Quit trying to justify the cost and listen to actual users. Its worth its weight in gold. Time is money, right? It will save you tons of recovery time so you can back on the hunt.
I think the choice of pin pointers is a personal preference. My preference would be the pistol probe I think. If it can detect at 6" it would be perfect for coins that are generally less deep than that. Back in the seventies I dug hundreds of coins using a homemade coin probe a Bounty Hunter without a pinpoint feature. Most of my holes were less than 2" in dia. If I had had a pistol probe back then, the holes would have been smaller than that and recovery a lot faster. It took a lot of time to locate the coin with the probe especially if rocks were present or the coin was on the edge.
I have a Pro Pointer on order, but after reading this thread, I may cancel it and opt for the Pistol Probe even though I know nothing about it.
I do know that the White's Bullseye I've been using has left me asking. "Why didn't they make this thing to detect a couple of inches further?"
Going on with what? I think the whole depth thing with pinpointers is a bit of a strange debate...I want my pointer to tell me when I'm close to the target not 6 inches away from it. There are so many threads about pointer depth but I just don't think depth is really all that important with a pointer....as I said, I want to know if I'm close to the target...I would gladly choose a pointer that had a 2 inch depth over a 6 inch depth but that's just me. Stats, numbers, whatever...get out there and find some stuff.