NOX discussion

Here is my opinion , performance wise 900 vs 800 , no performance differences Im guessing , just ID range and maybe some waterproofing improvements , Depth wise & screen capabilities an improvement over my 800 , but not a CTX3030 , as far as depth comparisons CTX vs Manticore , im waiting on the 15 coil vs the CTX3030 & 17 at the beach , as far as the ID 800 vs Manticore , it will be a learning process all over again , as I had ID's pegged with the 800 on the beach as far as coins go , for you to knock off the Manticore :shock: , I would say don't because it's much better than a Equinox , winter breaks , the Manticore gives me hope , on hunting more , I mostly hunted beaches here with the 800 , the CTX was a tad heavy , with the telescopic shaft simular like the CTX , lighter than the 800 , deeper than the 800- with better id & screen , the Manticore found it's way to my beach hunting tool box , as far as new technology opinions :roll: , maybe the same processor in the Manticore as the CTX- with less screen capabilities , I like it , so far , just hunted my yard , The trash must be removed 1st . , the targets identified were deeper & 3 times as much picked up with the Manticore vs the 800 , which means much more is there on my 2 arce 1800 property than thought , good luck with your choice , they are all good machines , how deep are your pocket's :?::money::lol: Happy Hunting , Earl PS If you don't wan't to spend 1600 or the price of a CTX3030 , and if you don't already own a Equinox , the 900 can fit your budget gap !
 
Last edited:
You would have to own all five to know for certain in your soil conditions and for the targets you are hunting.

For me, I have four of the five on your list (no Manticore).
Gold prospecting, Deus 2 is dead last, not even close.
Target separation in trash for coin sized objects Deus 2 is first.
Overall depth on coin sized objects where I detect……1/2” difference at most and who comes in first changes.
For ergonomics it goes to Deus 2 but only with the 9” coil with Nox 900 close behind.
Versatility and build quality goes to the Legend.
For ease of use including charging and water use….Deus 2 is dead last and Nox 800 is DQ.
For most impressive goes to the Legend.

Read that topic I linked.

Thank you for the reply Jeff.

I value your opinion, but that is something I would have to see to believe.

Engineers can easily make a detector take as many snapshots per second as they want. But, the detector would get to the point that audio clipping would begin, and according to Minelab, poor target ID accuracy would also begin due to insufficient information from the target. I believe that on those detectors, maximum recovery speed is set to just below the point that those negative aspects begin to occur. As such, separation ability should be similar among those detectors. I mean "similar" in the sense that if there is a difference, it wouldn't be a "Wow! What a difference", but rather more likely a difference coinciding with the test's margin of error.

If I did a detector separation comparison test, I would use two nonferrous coins, that have very different IDs. I would set the detectors up with maximum recovery speed, and the rest as I described, then see how close together I could get the coins before each coin's ID merged. Coil height and swing speed are critical with this type of test, so both of those would have be to very consisent between detectors.
I kinda think like the depth plateau we have also reached a speed plateau. I don't think there is enough speed difference to fret about between the 800, 900, D2, Legend, and Manticore. Depth in average dirt probably not much difference either. Now it boils down to how much do you want to spend on extra bells and whistles? Or the brand you jell with better.
 
I personally think you made a great choice. You get used to that CTX3030 and you'll never look back. There's a few guys from back in the early days of the 3030 - Dirtfishing (Bill_S on here), cutaplug, mowerdog, pondguru - on youtube who really know their stuff. Also, Andy Sabisch's book will help you. I'll get flamed for this I'm sure but (coming from 8 years on the 3030's little brother, the E-Trac) I think the CTX is the best hobbyist machine out there.


:cool3:
I agree. I like the simplicity of the Equinox, turn it on, noise cancel and go. But, I like the fact that the CTX allows the user to select many different settings and create many different patterns. It just makes sense. I should be getting Sabisch's book on Saturday. I have his Equinox book and it was very helpful. I feel the CTX manual will be the same.
 
Instead of taking shots at this company or that, here is a thread on another forum that has two posters giving their experiences after using the Equinox 800, 900, Manticore and Deus 2. These same posters also have experience with the CTX 3030. There is also some input from one Manticore field tester who also field tested the original Equinox 800 and the 900.

You own the Deus II ? Which machine do you use? Which one do you think is best?
 
85% of my hunting is done on salt water beaches and in shallow water around Corpus Christi Texas.
I bought the 600 instead of the 800 when they first came out. Very satisfied with it and don't miss the added features of the 800.
Just upgraded to a 900 instead of the Manticore for the same reasons ... the added features wouldn't be used enough to justify the extra cost.
In fact the 900 has features I will most likely never use and a few that the Manticore don't have.
I am very eager to set the vibrator for the nickle range only and see how that works out.
Still I think I bought something that I really didn't need but I consider it a deserved luxury.
Plus the outdoor exercise does promote good health.
The most expensive detector is not always the best choice.
 
"deserved luxury". I like that Willie. I think I'll use it next time I'm asked why I spend $1,400 on a metal detector when I can get one for half that. Or when I'm asked why I would spend $3,000 on a guitar when I can get one for less than half that.
 
Back
Top Bottom