To add a little background to my above post:
Petitioner brought a motion in his suit, claiming, without evidence, that the FBI was destroying and concealing evidence, therefore he should be allowed to question, under oath, lead FBI agent Archer as well as be awarded attorneys fees.
In reading their motion, i pointed out that they had no actual evidence, just accusations of wrongdoing and that their chances of winning the motion was virtually zero without evidence.
Petitioner then went on to claim they had evidence that there was a night dig (and thus the FBI doctored and forged evidence), i countered that, no, you don't have actual evidence of that, as if you did, you'd have included it in your motion as it would have been a slam dunk win.
Petitioner continually claims this case is just getting started, on the contrary, it is quickly coming to a close. Sure, he can maybe scrape the money together to bring another suit against the FBI for allegedly recovering gold, but it will be dismissed for lack of evidence in short order after being filed.
So far, since i've based my observations on the actual evidence, not a narrative i want to fulfill, my predictions have been 100 percent correct.