The FBI Files: Dents Run Civil War Gold

[FreeBirdTim]

I could have believed the guy if he had stuck to the original tale of 52 bars weighing 50 pounds each (2,600 lbs. total weight). But claiming that there were nine tons of gold (18,000 lbs.) and later adding on that there were tons of silver as well killed what little credence his tall tale had.

The sad part is when I did a Google search to find the original tale, all that came up were endless articles about the FBI stealing this guy's gold. He's gotten his 15 minute of fame, but he'll never go away until he makes money off the tall tale.

 

[SeabeeRon]

The latest from Dennis...


DELAY , DELAY , DELAY. Another delay by the DOJ . this is the 3rd one since Jan. What the DOJ does is give 80 federal cases to one lawyer that cannot do his job so the cases drag out for months and years. Well this time we said NO and NO to other delays, its time to get this case moving again. I think they filed over 15 delays in our case. Our TV series is moving ahead and everything that happens in the courts will be on the TV Show. EVERYTHING so the public can see how our courts work. Everything from day 1, Nov 15, 1975 up until 2025 will be on the show. So now we plan to move ahead and give the Senate our info and get things moving ahead. This lost gold story is not over YET, its just getting started . The public only knows about 10% , there is 90% to come.
DCNR is moving slow on getting back to my lawyer on if they are willing to work with us on some Major Civil War Sites we located.
I will update again when new info comes in. Thank You

 

[Tom_in_CA]

I could have believed the guy if he had stuck to the original tale of 52 bars weighing 50 pounds each (2,600 lbs. total weight). But claiming that there were nine tons of gold (18,000 lbs.) and later adding on that there were tons of silver as well killed what little credence his tall tale had.....

And you'll notice that this ^ ^ phenomenon is part & parcel to all such treasure legends. They always seem to grow. Like fish stories. With each re-telling, the amount of treasure grows, eh ? And : The bigger the treasure, then, by golly, the MORE TRUE IT MUST BE, right ?

The latest from Dennis...

Thanx Ron. Read between the lines there, and you will see the unmistakable inference that : "Delays" are simply more "proof of fabulous treasure". There is never any delays for ANY OTHER REASON than : To steal goodies from you and I. Amazing how simply ANYTHING can be "proof of fabulous treasure"

Also contained in your quote from him is the other tactic of "cliff-hangers". Same psychology as D.R. and a host of other legends. Ie.: Any day now, and "tip of iceberg", and "tune in next week", etc.... Always to infinite regress.

 

[GoDeep]

I will say, at least this time he admits the delays are because the DOJ's caseload is too large. Must have been a Freudian slip by Plaintiff.

Also, it should be noted that plaintiff claimed last spring that they had sent the "info" to the Senate, then in the fall of last year said they hadn't sent it yet, but were going to "next week" and here he is now saying they haven't sent it. If you're following: Sent it, Didn't Send It, Sending it Next Week, Didn't Send it.

Also, he's wrong about the public only knows 10 percent of it (they actually know about 1 percent of it), However, if the public follows this thread, they know about 99 percent of the case and that there was no night dig, no gold found and that Plaintiff has engaged in a years long campaign of coverup and deceit.

 

[SeabeeRon]

I will say, at least this time he admits the delays are because the DOJ's caseload is too large. Must have been a Freudian slip by Plaintiff.

Also, I don't know if the DOJ asked for another delay since last week, but as of last week, his own attorney agreed to the delay, so I'm not sure what this "we said NO and No to other delays" is, because in an actual court of law, both parties agreed to the delay. In Pertinet Part of the order dated 2/20/24:

"MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's Unopposed [52] Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's Opposition and Reply shall be filed on or before February 29, 2024, and Plaintiff's Reply shall be filed on or before March 14, 2024. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/20/2024. (lcapm1) (Text entry; no document attached.)"

Also, it should be noted that plaintiff claimed last spring that they had sent the info to the senate, then in the fall of last year said they hadn't sent it yet, but were going to "next week" and here he is now saying they haven't sent it. If you're following: Sent it, Didn't Send It, Sending it Next Week, Didn't Send it.

Also, he's wrong about the public only knows 10 percent of it (they actually know about 1 percent of it), However, if the public follows this thread, they know about 99 percent of the case and that there was no night dig, no gold found and that Plaintiff has engaged in a years long campaign of coverup and deceit.

View attachment 592272

See, that is the thing with habitual lying, you eventually get got in your own web of lies!

 

[GoDeep]

Addendum: It does appear the DOJ filed for another extension to last weeks extension. Will post it up shortly.

 

[GoDeep]

Talk about a lie of omission, read Plaintiffs above post to the public. He fails to tell them the reason the DOJ requested another week extension is because the lead counsel is fighting an illness.

The DOJ's request to delay the filing a week will be granted. Talk about a petty move by Plaintiff. He wants to act all tough to his followers without telling them the real reason for the DOJ's delay request.

 

[Tom_in_CA]

I will say, at least this time he admits the delays are because the DOJ's caseload is too large.....

I got the impression , from the quotation, that Dennis infers that there is PURPOSEFUL making of "caseloads that are too large", SO THAT his case would-be-delayed. Such that, it's not normal back-log, but instead : Purposed manipulation (ie.: "part of the grand conspiracy).

 

[too_pointer]

Opposition needs to reply by March 7,th . You in that ?
too_

 

[GoDeep]

I got the impression , from the quotation, that Dennis infers that there is PURPOSEFUL making of "caseloads that are too large", SO THAT his case would-be-delayed. Such that, it's not normal back-log, but instead : Purposed manipulation (ie.: "part of the grand conspiracy).

Agreed, rather than be truthful and tell them (his followers) the real reason: the lead attorney is battling an illness.

He's got to spin it into something nefarious and then act like a tough guy for opposing the delay (which he'll lose anyway).

 

[Tom_in_CA]

... then act like a tough guy for opposing the delay ....

Well now that you clarify that he KNOWS FULL WELL the 1) sickness and 2) case load of the bureaucracy of *true* workload,then : Either he's "acting like a tough guy" (yet really knows the reason for the delay, hence is "lying"), or : He is a very selfish & self-interested person.


Like the type person that walks into a crowded store, where clerks are doing-their-durndest to wait on customers. But : He thinks he should come first before the others in line. It doesn't matter that workers are busy helping others. It doesn't matter that someone is sick. Ie.: As if Dennis is the "apex of the universe" . That .... if you delay assisting him, THEN PRESTO : You must be in a conspiracy to harm him personally.


Because at first blush, in the quote, it *seemed* as if he painted the delays as : Part of conspiracy to steal and hide treasure. Unless someone digs deeper, that certainly seemed like the insinuation.

 

[GoDeep]

Ah, Ok, so there isn't actually a TV show. If you read his last post, he sure made it like there was one. This is where asking the right questions can elicit the truth.

 

[GoDeep]

His post from a year ago (posted below) is almost verbatim from his one today:

 

[GoDeep]

And his post from two years ago (posted below) claims they already signed up with a film crew. Saying Plaintiff ain't being fully honest would be an understatement:

 

[NewAge]

The TV show saga will never end......this is their go to script.
Years and tears worth of upcoming TV series promises never materialized.

I'm starting to think the whole Senate deal is another attempt similar of when they tried to scare the FBI with untrue forum posts.

Im guessing .......They have nothing to send to the Senate but for some reason think claiming they do will somehow force the courts to favor them when ruling.

Not only are these guys proven liars they aren't very smart.

 

[GoDeep]

And of course the DOJ's request to postpone a week was granted. There is no plausible scenario where Plaintiffs attorney didn't try to talk him out of opposing the DOJ's request. But he wanted to act like a big shot to his crowd knowing he could mislead them and not tell them the actual reason the DOJ needed a week delay: The lead attorney had the flu.

Petty, vindictive, uncompassionate and ill-advised move on his part.

02/28/2024
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's [53] Motion for Extension. Having shown good cause, and noting Plaintiff's opposition, the court extends the deadline to file its opposition and reply brief to March 7, 2024. (lcapm1) (Text entry; no document attached.)

 

[GoDeep]

DOJ's reply from last week and Plaintiffs latest reply. Now it's in the hands of the judge to rule.

Both are rehashing what they've argued before. No new evidence has appeared. I agree with Plaintiff that the FBI should be releasing any expenditure reports it has.

 

[Tom_in_CA]

........ No new evidence has appeared. .........

thanx for the update go-deep.

And surprise surprise "no new evidence". Who woulda thunk it ? However, plaintiff can spin a failure to release "expenditure reports" as being : Evidence. As in, shucks, what is the FBI hiding ? And to Dennis' way of thinking, this is the smoking gun of "fabulous treasure".

 

[GoDeep]

It's the 6-year anniversary of the FBI's dig at Dents Run!

 

[SeabeeRon]

It's the 6-year anniversary of the FBI's dig at Dents Run!

Well Happy Anniversary!