Quite frankly I don't believe the coin is genuine nor is it even gold. ...
How about "Coin jewelry" ?Also I would add that even if a gold coin : That gold coins found mounted as jewelry (bezzled, etc...) I would put in the category of "jewelry". Not "coin". But ... that's just me.
This is not right. One side is a Mexico coin 1946 the other is Queen Elisabeth II 1787 (she was queen from 1952).
The Mexico DOS PESO coin would have an Eagle on the other side.
https://www.jmbullion.com/2-peso-mexican-gold-coin-vy/
Isle of Man coin:
https://en.ucoin.net/catalog/?country=isle_of_man
Also, the surface quality is very poor and the color is a perfect match to the bezel.
Unfortunately, what I think you have is a fantasy coin produced by casting two different coin sides out of some base metal then plated.
How about "Coin jewelry" ?
Tom...….my "coin jewelry" response was done "tongue-in-cheek". It's all semantics and who really cares?Huh ? Sure, it's "coin jewelry". Which is jewelry, not a coin (for purposes of classifying type-finds).
For example: I know a guy who's found 3 gold coins mounted @ jewelry. Eg.: Krugerand in bezzle/necklace, etc... And he's also found 2 gold coins. If you were to ask him "How many gold coins have you found ?", he would answer: "3 in jewelry, and 2 as numismatic coin-losses". He would not say "5".
If gold coins mounted in jewelry count as coins (for purposes of md'ing classifications), then I'm at 16 gold coins, not 15. Because I found a Dos pesos in an earing mount before .
The difference is (for purposes of md'ing strategy) is that: Jewelry could have been lost in a sand box yesterday. But to find a gold coin, in the context of time-period circulation, is quite a different function, strategy, history, etc....
I took my gold coin to my Jeweler today and the coin tested 18k and the benzel tested 10k. This a good find, but not what I had hoped for Oh well back to the grind.HH