ParkHunter
Forum Supporter
I have recently watched the video which the AT PRO user didn't hit a silver half @ 8 inches, and I have nothing to say but it was a faulty machine..or possibly too new, before garrett patched 'glitches' with the machine.
I just tested it in my test garden, and the AT PRO hit my B.F. silver half at over 10"...but was very very faint, yet the VDI read from 83-95 , pretty accurate I'd say.
Here is a video I also found where it hits some good deeper dimes...(I still will need to test the PRO on dimes..will post later)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCpPhKXEj0g
I do not know why oregonmetaldetector's AT PRO did not hit a half at 8"..but I'm going to ASSUME he had an either:
NEW (non patched) machine
or
FAULTY machine
The AT PRO I am currently using was made 4 months back...so one of the newer ones..and it hits deep silver just fine...only had one faulty signal and it was a merc that was very deep (8"+) but I dug it anyways...
If anyone else has performed test with newer machines/would like to share..please do so..
HH ! Hope this can help some of the AT PRO critics
I just tested it in my test garden, and the AT PRO hit my B.F. silver half at over 10"...but was very very faint, yet the VDI read from 83-95 , pretty accurate I'd say.
Here is a video I also found where it hits some good deeper dimes...(I still will need to test the PRO on dimes..will post later)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCpPhKXEj0g
I do not know why oregonmetaldetector's AT PRO did not hit a half at 8"..but I'm going to ASSUME he had an either:
NEW (non patched) machine
or
FAULTY machine
The AT PRO I am currently using was made 4 months back...so one of the newer ones..and it hits deep silver just fine...only had one faulty signal and it was a merc that was very deep (8"+) but I dug it anyways...
If anyone else has performed test with newer machines/would like to share..please do so..
HH ! Hope this can help some of the AT PRO critics