.... Now that maybe because they haven't sunk deeper because they were lost later.....
history hippy, when I started this hobby, as a teenager, in the mid 1970s, we would routinely hit a particular elementary school in our city, that dated to the early 1920s.
And I noticed that the predominant # of wheaties and silver were 1940s/50s and early '60s losses. And occasionally when we DID find a merc or a wheatie from the '20s, it evidenced more wear (like it had been in circulation for 20+ yrs, and lost later).
And at the time, I attributed it to the notion that : The older coins must be deeper. And thus our 77b and 66TR just can't reach that deep. This was a logical thing to think, since, by then, we had rationalized that there did seem to be a correlation of depth vs age . Clad on top, wheaties deeper, etc...
HOWEVER, as technology improved in the 1980s, and we went from 3 or 4" depth ability, to 7 to 8" depth ability, we noticed an interesting phenomenon : That it was STILL primarily 1940s/50s silver. Even though depth was no longer an issue. Occasionally we'd get a teens/20s low-circulation wheatie (lost early on), that was easily in our depth reach.
And now I realize that the demographics of the teens/20s/30s, was much different than the post WWII years. In the teens/20s/30s, kids simply had very very little money to carry. Contrast to the post war years, when EVERY KID had a few coins jangling in his pocket. And schools instituted the hot lunch programs (where you had to bring a quarter to school). And milk (where you had to bring a nickel).
So it turns out the difference @ age of silver was strictly a cultural/prosperity shift thing. And nothing to do with the depth of our detectors.