The FBI Files: Dents Run Civil War Gold

He posted up pictures from this spring of some guys poking around the dents run site and since they are blurry, he's claiming they were using camera jammers.
He claims they were jamming because, after the first color video snippet, the rest were in B&W. However, the reason for this is that the camera switched to low-light IR mode. The color video was taken at 5:03pm, the next (B&W) video is tagged 5:17pm. Sunset on that day was 5:13pm, and depending on where you are in the mountains it can start getting darker even sooner. You can see in the B&W videos that the IR LED has kicked on because something very close (along the bottom) is getting washed out.

Looks to me like the camera is stuck inside a tree hole or something similar. Someone could visit after dark, take an IR viewer, and collect some abandoned trail cams.
 
Easily explained by the time stamps in the video clips now posted. At 5:03pm there would still be enough natural light to produce color images. By 5:22 and 5:27pm the natural light has faded enough so the trail cam is using IR flash and the images are now produced in black and white.
Sorry, I was typing while you posted this. I completely agree.
 
I do believe they sent some e-mails or something to PA DCNR about these numerous Civil War sites they have discovered......would a FOI request uncover what they sent in as evidence.

I may have stated earlier in this thread.....I had the chance to look over the evidence they sent in to prove they found a Templar castle.It was laughable to say the least.One key piece was a photo of a retaining wall someone had built along their driveway with normal rocks.

It would be so much fun to look over whatever "proof" they think they have that will change what we know about the Civil War.
 
I do believe they sent some e-mails or something to PA DCNR about these numerous Civil War sites they have discovered......

I would HOPE HOPE HOPE that any other govt. agency "take heed" and ignore any such solicitations. By now, hopefully word is out in the grapevine to other Govt. agencies to : Disregard salacious stories, supposed treasures, sites, etc..... from FK & gang. I'm sure the F.B.I. wishes they had never gotten involved in this circus & legal battle :roll:
 
Easily explained by the time stamps in the video clips now posted. At 5:03pm there would still be enough natural light to produce color images. By 5:22 and 5:27pm the natural light has faded enough so the trail cam is using IR flash and the images are now produced in black and white.

Ding, Ding, Ding , we have a WINNER.

Sunset is at 5:26pm at the time of these pictures/vids, so its getting dark out and the cameras switch over from color to IR/black and white. He has to know this as he posted pictures from the same type of camera from the FBI dig in color and black and white 6 years ago.

Would someone please go over there and politely tell this jackwagon that the pictures turning to black and white, isn't some conspiracy to jam his cameras, that if he read the camera instructions, that's what moultrie cameras do in low light conditions?!!
 
Last edited:
He has to already know this (that his cameras switch to IR/Black in white in low light) and is just purposely misleading his followers. My evidence: he posted these pictures from the same camera location back in 2018, one during the day at 1:10pm(color), and one during low light at 7:04 pm (black and white). As I recall, sunset was around 7:15pm at the time of these photos.

Note the branch in front of the camera in both the black and white and in the color shot:

dentssite1pm.JPG


night 1 (1).JPG
 
It's just staggering how utterly corrupt Plaintiff is. He will say or do anything, with no regards to the truth, to mislead the public.
 
I want to post this picture just to memorialize his claim. Note how he says, "after they left the cams went back to taking color pictures". Another lie of omission as he leaves out this critical context: "the next morning" the cams went back to taking color pictures.

jammers.jpg
 
For those curious where his camera is hidden in his latest posts, this picture is from my trip up there last fall and it's in the clump of trees on top of the rock ledge at the far right:

cameraposition.jpg
 
Last edited:
He claims they were jamming because, after the first color video snippet, the rest were in B&W. However, the reason for this is that the camera switched to low-light IR mode. The color video was taken at 5:03pm, the next (B&W) video is tagged 5:17pm. Sunset on that day was 5:13pm, and depending on where you are in the mountains it can start getting darker even sooner. You can see in the B&W videos that the IR LED has kicked on because something very close (along the bottom) is getting washed out.

Looks to me like the camera is stuck inside a tree hole or something similar. Someone could visit after dark, take an IR viewer, and collect some abandoned trail cams.
Great response Carl over on his Facebook group!
 
Dennis is claiming that Dent's Run is somehow connected to the Battle of Gettysburg?!?

Where is the battle site in relation to Dent's Run?
 
Great response Carl over on his Facebook group!

What is the link to what you're referring to ? Every Facebook page link, I see, relating to "Dents Run", all say : "This page is not available right now "....
 
Is parada going to claim that the Battle of Gettysburg was a planned distraction to hide the movement of millions in gold bars?

OF COURSE ! Why ELSE would the G-men have planned the battle of Gettysburg ?? And shucks, notice that you don't hear much about Dents Run (outside of Dennis's own personal smoke-making). Therefore : The devious Gettysburg distraction MUST BE WORKING.

It's bullet proof logic. Tsk tsk.
 
Two things that stick out to me:

1. When Carl says "they worked after they left because the sun came up", Plaintiff in his response didn't deny Carl's assertion. To me, that demonstrates he was trying to mislead people in to believing the cameras went back to color photos immediately after they left the area, not the next morning as we now know is the actual truth.

2. When Plaintiff says, "This never happened before". That's just an outright bald faced lie. He's posted several evening IR/Black and white photos from his trailcams in the past (see below), presumably the very same trail cams judging by the bottom display imprinted on the photos.

jammers1.jpg


Past photos that Plaintiff posted from his trail cams that were shot in low light conditions in black and white, rendering his claims "it's never happened before" a bald-faced lie:

dentsbucketshadownight.jpg


night 1 (1).JPG


dentssitenight3.jpg
 
He's posted several evening IR/Black and white photos from his trailcams in the past
Yes, and note in the second image above, the site is being secured prior to the start of the excavation, on Mar. 12, 2018. Look at the condition of the slope above the trail and to the right of the patrol. You can clearly see soil slip/erosion of the slope indicating recurring issues most likely due to the ground water which has created the very wash under the large rock which Plaintiff calls a "cave".

This would be the same area of the slope in which we see the person in the color images appearing to probe the ground.

We now know that ground water and slides were an ever-present concern at this particular location of the trail. Remember the DCNR was aware of the groundwater conditions and the large sinkhole that was just forward of the rock for many years prior. They likely were addressing such issues in 2015 when Plaintiff captured images of the backhoe at the site then.

It would not be a stretch to presume the men appearing in the trail cam images on 27 JAN 2024 are employed by some agency (possibly DCNR or contractors) responsible to monitor the site conditions for such soil slip. This would be especially true following such a recent and rapid excavation at a former slide site. What some may consider nefarious may actually just be two guys doing their job.

Note that in the color video clip at 5:03PM, we see the person carrying a long, clean, dry stick with indications of moisture only within the first few inches of the stick tip, as he approaches the trail cam. It appears he is using the stick as some sort of rudimentary soil penetration test and crude method for measurement of ground water which could contribute to soil slip. He uses two hands at one point to exert considerable force on the stick in attempt to penetrate the slope as much as possible.

The actions of the Plaintiff here essentially amount to harassment of these individuals and the unsuspecting public in general. It could be considered a threatening action to citizens who are accessing the forest to work or recreate and wind up having their face plastered in online forums. Plaintiff's use of the trail cams in this manner serves no legitimate purpose. Presuming Plaintiff has written permission to keep personal property in a state forest for more than 24 hours, this permission should be revoked based on these actions and Plaintiff should be charged with a summary offense. If Plaintiff's concerns of nefarious activity were genuine, he should confidentially submit such images to the authorities for review and/or further investigation, not in a FB discussion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom