stetam
Elite Member
Be kind KOB. He’s a detector tester, crossbow tester, ATV tester, car tester…..
I’ve done my best to get something out of his videos and information he keeps posting. Absolutely nothing I can use or put to work in real life detecting. Sadly this guy has posted this same garbage everywhere and any place that he can. Hundreds of pointless videos and posts all over multiple forums. Sad. No telling what he could find if he put that much effort into research or detecting in the field. Not trying to be rude or mean. Just the facts.
Not one since the start of this thread.Yeah……right. Talk is cheap. Show us all of the gold or rings and not pull tabs or canslaw that your videos keep showing. It’s easy to say that you are changing the odds. I’m sure you and your reports are not finding a lot of gold. The lack of finds speaks volumes about how great your knowledge of detectors and their use really is. It takes a lot of effort to get gold on land in public places consistently. There’s a reason why the same detectorist keep finding the best stuff. You said it yourself rubbish.
He’s not showing how to find gold. He’s showing how not to find gold…. promote the d2 coil and direct you to his nonsensical videos.Not one since the start of this thread.
tnsharpshooter Gold ring system — Day 224: No gold rings found!
My God! This thread is now 62 pages long!
A quote from a play whose title describes this extravaganza:
"He that hath a beard is more than a youth, and he that hath no beard is less than a man: and he that is more than a youth is not for me, and he that is less than a man, I am not for him."


I don't think we will ever see that in our lifetime
My question is.. have we come to a final conclusion on this thread yet...![]()

Quite a thread. I figured it would be. When you think about the title I used.
Seems select digging gets smaller attention when it is dealing with high conductors - Coins, silver rings, etc.
But when the expression gold ring is used in same sentence as expression select digging is used folks get a bit excited.
But this excitement here seems is not the jubilant type excitement. Go figure.
Yeah guess I’m the first one here to talk more about a more detailed way to select dig gold rings. That really involves no disc or notching like some have talked about in the past. And really has little to do with audio quality the detector gives.
Also let me say this. A piece of iron using MF model detector could exist near a gold ring. Yet the detector gives ID in gold ring range. Question..Could the tonal nuance of the signal be negatively affected meaning user hears the audio of gold ring yet hears no iron tone and thinks uh oh not a gold ring sounding target and walks. Gold ring there the whole time. Or gold rig is tilted, this tilt could drive tonal behavior and audio nuance. This kinda gold ring might be walked on instead of dug.
So more careful study using this HF2 coil could indeed give use more info in which to base dig/no dig decision.
I showed videos using at least 2 MF models made by 2 different manufacturers on the above.
No iron tone heard.
So user wouldn’t even maybe think about calling ID into question maybe. Or call the audio quality of target into question.
Sounds like a final conclusion to me. Now maybe everyone will have more time to get back to the fields/parks/beaches and go in search of the elusive gold treasures.I don't think we will ever see that in our lifetime![]()
Time will tell... we haven't seen him post pictures of a gold ring next to steel wool or a nail going through the ring, how about the styrofoam blocks lets seeSounds like a final conclusion to me. Now maybe everyone will have more time to get back to the fields/parks/beaches and go in search of the elusive gold treasures.

My question is.. have we come to a final conclusion on this thread yet...![]()