Fir469 and Cfmct-PI and others with input- Both of you seem to be suggesting that working the water would yield better results than the dry sand. I think for most beaches you're probably correct, but the Nags Head area, where I mostly detect is a different beach than most. First, it's almost impossible to find the water calm enough to allow you to swing a metal detector without getting pummeled by waves. The same winds that brought the Wright brothers to the Outer Banks, to get the first plane off the ground, also usually keeps the surf pretty rough. Also, the OBX beaches both erode and rebuild more than most. The cottage that was 100ft away from the shoreline during the summer can literally be standing in the water after a hard winters storm. That having been said, I usually try to find washovers- areas where the waves have broken through the dunes and created a deeper channel than the surrounding beach, or cuts where the waves have eroded a cliff like structure in the beach. These areas always seem to produce plenty of coins and other metal objects, but perhaps coins are more often lost in dry sand vs rings? Would I be better off hunting as close to the waters edge as possible, where I may or may not be getting any signals, or hunting where I'm finding the most targets wether near the water or not? I always assumed that if I were in an area finding lead fish weights, coins, metal fishing lures and such, then I should be in a good location to pull a ring. Any thoughts?