Compass
Forum Supporter
Many of us on this forum have both PI and multi-frequency detectors for beach hunting. I probably use my pulse detectors 90%-95% of the time because I like the extra depth and the PI's seem to work better on some of my black sand beaches.
However, I only found 1 gold chain this year and that was during one of the rare hunts when I used the Excal. I think that if I had used the Excal more during 2016 I would have surely found more chains (and perhaps more small gold) but wonder if I would have found as many gold rings?
I'm thinking that when targets are plentiful and/or shallow, it might make more sense to use the Excal when (mineralization) conditions allow it. When signals are scarce, maybe the PI is the better option in order to get those deeper targets.
Anyway, I haven't found a gold ring in about 5 months so I have plenty of time to think about my detecting strategy. I do plan on using the Excal more this year and seeing what happens. GL & HH!
However, I only found 1 gold chain this year and that was during one of the rare hunts when I used the Excal. I think that if I had used the Excal more during 2016 I would have surely found more chains (and perhaps more small gold) but wonder if I would have found as many gold rings?
I'm thinking that when targets are plentiful and/or shallow, it might make more sense to use the Excal when (mineralization) conditions allow it. When signals are scarce, maybe the PI is the better option in order to get those deeper targets.
Anyway, I haven't found a gold ring in about 5 months so I have plenty of time to think about my detecting strategy. I do plan on using the Excal more this year and seeing what happens. GL & HH!