I am looking to get a detector to help me find fired brass cases and to recover the fired lead bullets. Secondary use will be general detecting on my property.
In the past I have used a Garret (cannot remember model #, it was an Ace) and I was pleased with it. I had gotten bitten by the gold bug but it did not pan out,,,Ha Ha Ha. Life happened and I had to sell the unit.
So,,,I am looking again for a detector, Most likely another Garret, but choosing one is my dilemma. I am sure the Ace 200 will work for my basic needs however I do like the features of the Ace 400.
Looking for advise from Garret owners.
Thanks
Eric
For a beginner, I see no performance difference between the ACE 200 and a
$75 Bounty Hunter Tracker IV. The 300 and 400 have a marginally larger coil, which yield marginally better depth. Perhaps more importantly, the bigger coil has a bigger footprint, allowing you to cover more ground in less time. So now you are looking at $ vs. $$ with a bigger coil.
If you justify spending the $$ on the larger coil, consider spending one more $ to get real benefits that can be noticed equally by novices and veterans. The AT-Pro provides you with ground balance, substantially better target ID and separation, and with the added benefit of being waterproof. No worries about rain... heck, go ahead and submerge it in creeks and lakes. So now you are looking at $$ vs. $$$ with real and noticeable performance benefits.
Of course, once you justified three $$$, you may as well ask yourself, what's next? The answer depends on your location and hunting environment. So far, all of the above detectors are single frequency machines. Moving up, means considering Pulse induction or Multi-frequency machines. Both of these styles can usually adjust for EMI (radio noise) and ground mineralization. For example, if you are in an area with black (iron) sand or heavy mineral deposits, an operator of an ACE machine will get false signals. To compensate for the false signals, the operator must turn down the sensitivity and sacrifice depth. The ATP has ground balancing and software to assist with such issues but its help is limited. Meanwhile the PI or MF machines have the hardware to compensate for the ground conditions and can continue with the same depth as in stable soils. The downside to PI machines (currently in production) is they cannot effectively discriminate unwanted targets. Additionally, you get the same target tone regardless of it being gold, silver, lead, or iron. Garret makes a PI, but does not manufacture a MF machine. So in summary, if you want the next big leap in performance, these machines range from $$$-$$$$$.