Ant said:
sandyfeet said:
My guess would be that its not real. I have never seen a cartridge without the caliber stamped on it/5.56mm/.223/30.06/7mm and so on. As for LC there is a round called .45 long colt (LC) but I would still treat it as real until you find out different. As for it going off and hurting you, It needs a gun barrel to go thru to do that.
HI sandyfeet.
Just for the record:
Not all small arms ammunition will have a head stamp delineating the caliber. You can in one of the pictures I just posted. The blue arrows are pointing to the 2 rounds that aren?t marked. The small round is a 17HMR (.17?) and the other one is a .223? round (the larger one), everything else has a head stamp.
PS
The older looking rounds I don't shoot.
[/quote
Hey Ant
Do you think those 2 are from brass bought for handloading? All the handloading I ever do is from factory ammo I buy and save the brass to load later
I can tell you that they sell gobs of factory ammo without caliber head stamps. This may vary from state to state. The .17 HMR round is new, from the factory. And the .223 round is a new Military tracer round. I only see a slight different on the head stamp of .223 round I posted, from the one that twistidd described ("stamped "LC 97"), and mine is stamped LC 86.
His description is very close to an AR15 .223 round. I'm not the first one to notice this in this topic.
twistidd wrote that the bullet head measured 1/4" (225/1000), that?s just 2/1000 off of a .223 (223/1000) bullet. That part of how I came to my deduction as well as the length and thickness of the base he described.
HH