Some Nokta Anfibio multi crosstalk from another forum

tnsharpshooter

Supporter
Forum Supporter
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
12,202
Location
Middle TN
Below copied from Dankowski forum. Posted by owner himself.
Seems Anfibio is a deep striker in Fla soil.


Enjoy

NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interestingly..... the CZ is one of the most EMI r
> esilient detectors on planet Earth. Fortunately...
> …. it is a simultaneous multi-frequency unit...… t
> hat performs substantially better in bad mineraliz
> ation...…. than nearly all single freq units; yet,
> certainly...… is not perfect. (And it's a late 198
> 0's & 1990 technology platform). I still retain a
> few new-in-box units in my inventory.
>
> Additional food-for-thought: I tested EQX in Pros
> pecting Mode-2 ...at one of my remote test-gardens
> ...….. with the following air-test results on a cl
> ad dime:
>
> Dec. 03 = 12" in Noise Cancel channel -6
> Dec. 04 = 10" in Noise Cancel channel -6
> Dec. 07 = 13" in Noise Cancel channel -6
>
> No other settings were changed. All parameters wer
> e exactly the same. On Dec. 03 and Dec. 07...... a
> bsolutely zero audible EMI. On Dec. 04..... I coul
> d hear a very slight amount of EMI chatter. Certai
> nly not enough for me to be concerned about. (((Or
> should I be!!))). Can you see were there's 'signif
> icance' in an air-test? Can you see were there's '
> significance' in carrying a spare dime.... for a 1
> 5 second test?
>
> At this same exact site...…. on Dec 09...…. I enco
> untered the following resultant:
>
> Noise Cancel channel '0' = 10"
> Noise Cancel channel '7' = 13"
>
> Soooooooooo………..by virtue of carrying a dime with
> me in the field...…. and taking 20 seconds to test
> the best (top two EMI-free) Noise Cancel channels.
> ... in an air-test; subsequently to witness/experi
> ence a 10" noise-free channel...… and a 13" noise-
> free channel...……. do you think I should then proc
> eed to hunt with the 10" channel???
> Again...… can you see the importance of carrying a
> spare dime with you...in the field?
> Changing MODES on the Equinox...…………. will express
> varying levels of EMI
> Changing Freqs in each individual MODE ….. will ex
> press varying levels of EMI
> The best EMI mitigation channel will not be the sa
> me channel..... for each MODE.... nor each frequen
> cy selection.
> All data holds true for other types/brands of dete
> ctors.
>
> Recently...….. I wanted to perform a curiosity-tes
> t with the Anfibio at a beat-to-death site. I had
> 'finished' this site with the Anfibio…….. with the
> best EMI-mitigation day...presenting 10.5" on a cl
> ad dime air-test. When I showed up on this particu
> lar day..... ready to commence my 'curiosity-test'
> ...…. my initial set-up protocol expressed a 13" a
> ir-test on a clad dime..... after implementing bes
> t EMI mitigation procedures. I was startled. This
> instantly prompted cancellation of my 'curiosity-t
> est'. I immediately commenced detecting this small
> (90' x 80') parcel. In 70 minutes...… I had dug
> 31 coins …… all coins exclusively within the depth
> strata of 10.5" - 12.5" (and no deeper...nor shall
> ower)......….with the newest coin being 1917. EDUC
> ATION #1
> EDUCATION #2 = At the 70 minute mark...…. the dete
> ctor instantly started 'chattering'. EMI. I atte
> mpted to mitigate EMI...… to no avail. I had comp
> leted 90' x 60' of the 90' x 80' parcel of land. I
> still had (and..... to this day...…. still have)……
> a high-producing 90' x 20' remaining strip of parc
> el to complete.
> I have hunted this site 8 times … in my life.....
> thus far.,.,.,.,.,.,., and with various detectors.
> ..… mostly proto's. Collectively..... all 8 hunts
> had produced 7 coins total. Soooooo…… to find 31 c
> oins in 70 minutes...….. is nothing short of stupe
> ndous.
> Is depth important?
> Is EMI mitigation important?
> Is bad mineralization mitigation important?
>
> I have every intent to talk about bad dirt. Need t
> o find the time!
> If you can not mitigate bad EMI FIRST...…. then ba
> d mineralization may be a moot point. . . . . (har
> dly matters). In other words: If you cannot handl
> e the ""AIR""...…. then...….. lowering the coil to
> the ""GROUND"" …… is irrelevant.
> Air first...….. then ground.


And
 
Interesting points on the Anfibio...this guy talks like a rocket scientist lol!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom