Running The AT Max At Full Sensitivity Using Threshold Turns It Into A Beast!

John-Edmonton

Elite Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
2,564
Location
Way up North, Canada



As previously mentioned, adjusting the threshold, to hear those soft whispers of deep targets and also to accommodate people with hearing loss, allows the user to get very deep targets and/or tiny targets often missed by others. This ability to hear those soft whispers benefits those hunting for gold nuggets, especially tiny ones. It also allows relic hunters to search deep. Deep targets are generally older. Often times, all you hear are soft whispers or a change in audio using the audio threshold. Should you dig those targets? Absolutely! For this air test I had the threshold set at +2, where I could hear a constant background hum. Measuring the distance from where a audio signal begins to repeat itself is where I tracked the distances today. I performed the air tests today in my backyard, where I could run the AT Max at full sensitivity. And what a difference it did make.:thumbup:

The above pic shows the depth (in inches) for the shown targets. I was using the true all metal mode, with the iron audio turned off. It is by far the deepest mode, and should be used when searching for known deep targets and areas not too trashy. It is also the preferred mode searching for those tiny nuggets, easily missed by other metal detectors.



Here is an air test using the zero discriminate mode. Again, it was set up using a threshold set at +2, noting soft whispers or a change in audio using the audio threshold. These again were the measurements that were used. Although not as deep as the true all metal mode, it still maintains a very good depth. And don't forget, that the AT Series have some of the best tones to ID targets correctly.




Here is a histogram comparison graph showing the differences in depth. It's all a mater of how a user utilizes his metal detector. On the one hand, a user can metal detect, hear those obvious good target ID sounding items and cherry pick the easy ones. However, those looking for those rare, well sought after targets will take advantage of the new Garrett AT Max's ability to sniff those extremely deep targets, often times missed by others.

Below is a pic of my air test target set up to pull out those numbers today. Remember, the air tests show a targets maximum potential. Depths will very from location to location. If a target has been in the ground for a very long time, part of it's surface may have broken down, leaching into the soil around it. The detector coil may read this as a larger target, allowing it to penetrate even deeper. To maintain a high level of reliability, I wore no watch, rings, belt and emptied my pockets. All targets were observed several times to make sure that the most accuracy was maintained for measuring repeatable audio at proper depth.
 

Attachments

  • backyard test 1.jpg
    backyard test 1.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 921
Appears the new Max has upped the ante in regards to depth especially at that price range. The Max is going to be a wonderful addition to my arsenal. And it's waterproof on top of everything else. Can't wait to get this detector in my hands.

John are you going to test the new ground balance window and report your results ? I'm interested to see the results. I know many were disappointed the Max didn't hit stores in June but it sure appears the wait will have been worth it.
 
Just checked out the price here in the UK, £785, other than it being waterproof where does it slot in at that price.
For the same money i can buy an Impact, or for quite a bit less a Deus lite, or Rutus, all pretty deep and top performers around iron, and there multi freq machines??
Will the Max be able to out perform these 3 machines??
Sure the Deus lite might as well be waterproof, if you just don't stick your head underwater lol
 
Just checked out the price here in the UK, £785, other than it being waterproof where does it slot in at that price.
For the same money i can buy an Impact, or for quite a bit less a Deus lite, or Rutus, all pretty deep and top performers around iron, and there multi freq machines??
Will the Max be able to out perform these 3 machines??
Sure the Deus lite might as well be waterproof, if you just don't stick your head underwater lol


For those of us in the USA who do hunt in the water , it matters. It's cheaper than the Impact here. The machines you named are good machines. They're useless under water though. No comparison.
 
I've not tried the AT Pro, is it good in salt water, what about the lower freq of the MAX for salt water??

For those of us in the USA who do hunt in the water , it matters. It's cheaper than the Impact here. The machines you named are good machines. They're useless under water though. No comparison.
 
I've used it in salt water. It works. A little chatter sometimes but if you manual ground balance you can make it run quietly. The Max has a wider ground balance window so I anticipate it being better.

I live 20 minutes from salt water and the same for freshwater swimming areas. If you want to hunt those areas it's imperative to have a waterproof machine.

I will say I have always been intrigued by the Rutus but they don't have a place to service their machines here in the US. I would really like to try the Hodograph.
 
please post a video of the air test with the zero mode with the gain backed down one or two notches where you would actually hunt with it. thanks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom