Strycker
Full Member
I've been thinking hard about getting a PI machine. I know that they are rather expensive investments. I live in VA and sometimes question the capabilities of my AT Pro. Don't get me wrong, it's a great machine and has been for the last 1.5 years. But with soil conditions being what they are, I wonder if a PI detector would not be more suitable. Using the 15" NEL Attack on the AT Pro I found the VT copper I posted this past week. What I'm skeptical of now though is that it might have been 9" deep, but running full sensitivity and ground balanced to the soil conditions, I feel this signal should have been a harder hit than a faint high tone. Seems that the depth for a coin in the ground 200 years should have had a nice halo around it and that the detector should have been able to "see" it much easier. Now that said, the guys with the 9x12 coils couldn't hear it at all. I was chasing a tone next to it with the NEL (turned out to be a nail) but their detectors just couldn't hit it at all. With such a large coil and only getting that depth out of it, it makes me wonder.
What are your thoughts on the PI vs the AT Pro? I know Garrett has the ATX, but I think if you're going that high, you might as well look at the GPX, correct? What's everyone else think? Open to opinions and suggestions. And I know I'm still learning the machine every time I'm out, but this one baffles me.
What are your thoughts on the PI vs the AT Pro? I know Garrett has the ATX, but I think if you're going that high, you might as well look at the GPX, correct? What's everyone else think? Open to opinions and suggestions. And I know I'm still learning the machine every time I'm out, but this one baffles me.