I decided to go through my spread sheet totals since I take good notes on each hunt. I track, in addition to the finds, the detector used, hours hunt, and location among other details. I decided to count the number of water/wet sand hunts that I used either the CZ or the SS and the total number of gold finds for each. I was a little surprised to see that the SS had done far better for me than the CZ. I used the Sand Shark 30 times last year and found 16 golds with it. I used the CZ 40 times and found only 8 golds. I can’t say that I feel that the SS is a superior detector than the CZ but it seems to be superior for the way I hunt. My best guess is that the one tone of the SS eliminates guess work and makes me dig things that would otherwise not sound as good with the CZ and possibly not be dug. I’m not 100% sure on the reasons for those results but that’s a big difference in the hunt to gold ratio for each detector. Any other theories say you pirates?