ohiochris
Elite Member
I have been looking at the Garrett ATpro because of features like the higher frequency , iron audio , etc , and I do really like most of what I read about it except for lack of threshold control. I walked away from whites detectors years ago because of the size and weight , which are still an issue for me since I am having some shoulder problems , but with the MXT offering pretty much all the functionality of the AT pro ( even iron audio ) , PLUS threshold control....which would be useful not only for locating deep targets but also for finding pockets of black sand when I go gold prospecting , I am actually thinking of possibly going back to a whites detector. That is if I can get used to the idea of it being heavier and bulkier. Of course I cant afford to upgrade yet anyway , and it may be a while , so Ive got plenty of time to keep looking into them , but if I could find a good enough deal on a slightly used MXT so that the price is closer to that of the AT pro , its looking like that may be more detector for the money in functions that I will actually use.
I dont know why Garrett didnt offer threshold control on the AT pro , that would have nearly made it hands down the most functional and affordable dual purpose detector out there.
I dont know why Garrett didnt offer threshold control on the AT pro , that would have nearly made it hands down the most functional and affordable dual purpose detector out there.